1. "There are many two and three time contest winners."
   "I congratulated the second- and third-place finishers."
2. "The bus station was full of Chicago and Minneapolis-bound passengers."
   "We had a largely Lebanese-and-Turkish-American clientele."

All of these sentences require what's known as "suspensive hyphenation." The correct example uses it properly: a hyphen seems to hang off the word "second" because "place" is implied. This is a correct, space-saving way to do it. If you wanted, you could also write, "second-place and third-place finishers" as well. The other sentences miss the mark, implying a bus station was "full of Chicago," or that the clientele was entirely of mixed Lebanese-and-Turkish-Americans -- a very specific mix!

1. Milk
   Horse
2. Love
   Ethics

A count noun is just what it sounds like -- a thing which can be counted, or, to be fancier, one which comes in discrete units. But don't be fooled. Though "ethics" sounds plural, it's really not. Consider: How would you count somebody's ethics?

1. A lump noun
   An irrational noun
2. A mass noun
   A verb

The formal name for this is "mass noun," though some people simply use "non-count noun." If you thought "irrational noun" was correct, you probably you have a background in math, in which there is such a thing as an "irrational number."

1. Clarify
   Describe
   Narrow
2. Amplify
   All of these

"Modify" in its grammatical sense can mean all of these and more. Adjectives describe nouns; that's their kind of "modification." Adverbs are more versatile: they can amplify or even de-emphasize a verb. "I frequently dress up" is an example of the former, while "I rarely dress up" is the latter.

1. Yes, "to" should be "at."
   Yes, "I" should be "me."
2. Yes, there should be a comma after "Kiki."
   No, the sentence is fine.

The easiest way to highlight this error is to strip away the fellow nouns "Jennie" and "Kiki." You're left with "Gavin administered the test to I," which definitely sounds wrong. This is because the speaker is the object, not the subject, of the sentence.

1. China
   china
2. constancy
   charity

In casual conversation, we often refer to a proper noun as a "name," and thus, it is capitalized. We included "china" with a lowercase "c" because it's an example of how proper nouns can lend their names to common ones. The type of tableware called china got its name from being first made in China.

1. Boxs
   Oxen
2. Lice
   Children

What's the rule here? When a word ends with a sibilant sound -- an "s"-like one -- we insert an "e" for easier reading. Except for "ox," which becomes "oxen," thanks to the word coming from far back in the Anglo-Saxon vocabulary, when the rules were different.

1. He
   It
   She
2. You
   None of them do

While regular nouns, both common and proper, require an apostrophe to become plural -- "Santiago" becomes "Santiago's" -- pronouns change form. Thus we get "his," "its," "her," and "your." Note: "Its" confuses many people, who feel that the "s" at the end merits an apostrophe, like "man's" or "priest's" would have. It's just not so, however.

1. "Ken Jennings must be quite well-read."
   "That's a much-loved local diner."
   "Your puppy is utterly adorable."
2. None of them
   All of them

This question deals with hyphenation in adverb-adjective compounds. When the adverb ends in "-ly," it is all right to omit the hyphen -- this means the "utterly adorable" example is correct. Other adverbs, like "much" and "well," require a hyphen.

1. Be
   Amble
2. Reveal
   Run

An irregular verb is one that doesn't follow the normal pattern of conjugation. "Run" is regular: We say "I run, you runs, he/she/it runs, we run, you all run." Pretty easy. But the verb "to be" follows this pattern: "I am, you are, he/she/it is, we are, you all are." It's more confusing for English-language learners to master.

1. "Woohoo!" is a sentence fragment.
   There should be a period, not an exclamation point, after "here."
2. "Woohoo" is not a word.
   There is nothing wrong with the sentence.

If you think "Woohoo" is not a word, you'll have to take that up with "Simpsons" creator Matt Groening. However, it can stand alone, with just an exclamation point (in fact, we could have said "...with these sentences" below, but that would have given things away.) "Woohoo!" is an interjection, which is one of the eight parts of speech.

1. Conjunctions
   Adjectives
2. Interjections
   Pronouns

You'll notice the similarity to the word "junction," as in railroads, and that's not a coincidence. Both deal with hooking things up. Common conjunctions include "and," "but" and "or," and everyday speech would be impossible without them.

1. Adjectives
   Other adverbs
2. Verbs
   Any of these

Schoolchildren are first taught that adverbs modify verbs, but teachers quickly clarify that they also apply to adjectives and adverbs. An example of that last one: "I almost never eat after 10 p.m." "Never" is the adverb that modifies "eat," but it it isn't true that you *never* eat after 10 p.m., so the adverb, "almost," alters the meaning of "never."

1. "Sports helps you to learn and to grow."
   "We went out to drink and dance."
2. "I want to immediately hire a new assistant."
   No, no split infinitives here!

An infinitive is the root form of a verb, always starting with "to." If you plug a word or words in between "to" and the actual verb, as in "to immediately hire," then it's a split infinitive.

1. Yes, that's true!
2. No, it's false.

Grammarians generally agree that sometimes a split infinitive is acceptable if it fits smoothly into the flow of the sentence. How do we know whether that's the case? Honestly, it's a matter of opinion; you have to learn to trust your own ear. Or you could ask a grammarian -- but who exactly is that? No one's job title is "grammarian." But when we use that term, we tend to mean teachers, editors, or professional writers.

1. "Go home!"
   "I can't do this right now."
   "Karen, are you unhappy?"
2. All of them
   Just "Go home!" and "Karen, are you unhappy?"

A sentence with direct address will often begin with a name or title. Above, it's "Karen," or it might be, "Sir." However, sometimes "you" is implied. That's the case with the first example. The unspoken subject is "You." "You, go home!"

1. An Oxford comma
   The final comma before a conjunction like "and"
2. I had drinks with Tom, Sandy, and Charlie.
   Any of these responses are acceptable.

Here's an example of the serial or Oxford comma: "The charity benefit featured some comedians, Sophie B. Hawkins, and Michael Buble." Some people argue -- vehemently! -- that the comma before "and" is unnecessary. However, consider how the sentence would read without it: It might seem that Sophie B. Hawkins and Michael Buble *were* the comedians. This is one reason for the equally vehement defense of the serial comma.

1. The word "it's" should be "its."
   "Two-Bit" should be "Two Bit."
2. "Two-Bit" should not be set off with commas.
   There is nothing wrong with the sentence.

This was discussed in another question -- "it's" versus "its" confuses a number of people, given that most nouns require an apostrophe "s" to be made plural; we're just underscoring it here. Also, dog lovers feel that a dog should be "him" or "her," not "it" -- but when you don't know the sex, "it" and "its" are acceptable.

1. A comma after "tried"
   A comma after "Volkswagen"
2. A colon after "Volkswagen"
   No extra punctuation is needed.

Teachers explain this point by saying, "If you open a door, you have to close it." When you're setting off a phrase with a comma, it's necessary to use another comma to return us to the action of the sentence. In this case, the words "a Volkswagen" are an appositive phrase, one that renames or clarifies a noun.

1. "Girl's" should be "girls'"
   "Sequined" should come after "girl's."
2. "While cleaning up after the party" should come after the "found" clause.
   There is nothing wrong with this sentence.

What's at issue *is* a dangling modifier, but the modifier is "sequined." It's not a girl who is "sequined," obviously, but the headband. Occasionally, when the context is very clear, this is OK. For example, if you'd found "a pair of black women's shoes," no one would think that they can only be worn by black women. At least, we hope not.

1. This sentence does not merit an exclamation point.
   There should be a comma after "so."
2. The referent of the pronoun "she" is unclear.
   Nothing is wrong with this sentence.

This sentence raises the question of who was happy? Was it Keiko or Sue-Lin? In doubt, readers will likely assume it's the subject of the sentence, Keiko. But it's still unclear writing; the burden is on the writer to make things as understandable as possible.

1. Yes, this is fine.
   No, "Charles' " should be "Charles's."
2. No, "put out" is slangy and unclear.
   This is a run-on sentence.

You could start a fight in some circles with this question. Some guides to grammar, including the classic "Elements of Style" by Strunk and White, and the Chicago Manual of Style, tell you that even when a singular noun ends in "s," it requires an apostrophe-s (e.g. "Charles's lawn"). However, since many forms of public communication (news media, websites, etc) follow AP style, which requires only the apostrophe, that's what we're going with here.

1. It's that &*%!! serial comma!
   The colon should be a semi-colon.
2. The word "simplicity" violates the sentence's parallel structure
   This sentence is fine as is.

Though not as easy to sum up as subject-verb disagreement, a lack of parallelism is something that instantly strikes the reader or listener as awkward. In the example above, the list starts with two items that are short verb phrases, then switches to just a noun. It "clangs" on the ear. But there are several ways to fix it, for example, ending with "and writing simply" or "and keeping simplicity in mind."

1. A semicolon after "worth."
   An exclamation point after "it."
2. An apostrophe in "repairs" ("repair's")
   This sentence is punctuated correctly.

In an admittedly informal Twitter survey of writers, the semicolon won the day as their favorite punctuation mark. Without a semi-colon, which links two independent clauses in one sentence, the above example is a run-on sentence.

1. A word that shows position, location or relation
   A word that connects phrases and clauses
2. A word that clarifies or adapts a verb
   A word that clarifies or changes a noun

Some schoolchildren are taught this with "Preposition Mountain." Things are "on" the mountain, "over" the mountain, "beside" the mountain and so on. It's a quick and vivid way to learn about this part of speech dealing with position, location or relation.

1. A noun
   An adverb
2. A preposition
   A pronoun

We're used to seeing "tomorrow" as a noun. It's the day after today, right? However, here it functions as an adverb, clarifying the verb "go" -- "tomorrow" is when we will "go." This is an example of how fluid language can be.

1. Pronouns are only used in casual conversation
   Nouns are the capitalized names for things or people.
2. Pronouns are usually used on second and subsequent references.
   Pronouns, as the name implies, have a positive connotation.

Pronouns replace nouns after it has been established what the noun is. A classic example is "Isabel" or "the woman" can become "she" on second reference. Other pronouns include "me," "you," and "this/that." Be careful when speaking or writing about several people. In a passage involving Kwame, Joe, and Ben, it's not also clear to whom "he" might refer.

1. "Jaye" should not be set off with commas.
   The writer should choose either "my sister" or "Jaye."
2. "A eulogy" should be "an eulogy."
   The sentence is correct.

The use of "a" versus "an" is ruled by the sound the following word begins with. Consonant words require "a," while vowel sounds take "an." Hence, we get "a eulogy" and "an honor," despite the fact that, technically, they start with a vowel and a consonant, respectively.

1. There should be a comma between careful and ethical.
   The word "always" is superfluous.
2. There shouldn't be an apostrophe in "today's."
   The sentence is correct as written.

When two adjectives have equal standing in a sentence​ and serve the same function, they are separated by a comma. No comma is used when the first adjective applies to the second: "A red brick building" shouldn't be described as "a red and brick" building.

1. Imperative
   Indicative
2. Subjunctive
   This sentence does not have mood.

The imperative mood is a command of some kind. Despite its implication of power (its root is "imperator," the Roman word for "emperor"), the use of the imperative doesn't necessarily imply the speaker has any sort of power, or is being bossy. "Help!' is a good example, or "Breathe" on the walls of yoga studios everywhere.

1. Things as they are
   A hope, uncertainty, or possibility
2. A request or command
   A query or question

The indicative mood is the easiest to understand for English-language learners. "I ran toward the finish line," is an example. "Should I run?" is the interrogative mood; "If I were to run," is subjunctive (a possibility or uncertainty); finally, "Run!" is imperative.

1. "Help"
   The speaker
2. The hearer ("You")
   There is no subject

In the imperative mood, the subject is always the person who hears/reads the statement. After all, it's a command, demand or request. It is usually omitted from the sentence and simply understood.

1. True
2. False

​If you were paying close attention to an earlier question, you might have recognized this because we listed "but" as a common conjunction. "But" doesn't actually link words and phrases, it separates them, and frequently is followed by "not." Hey, sometimes you need a wall, not a bridge (no political commentary intended).

1. Yes.
   No, never!
2. Do we have to open this can of worms?

Turning nouns into verbs has been an ​acceptable practice for a long time. After all, we've "shouldered the blame" for centuries. Objections tend to arise when "verbing" (a clever word that literally illustrates its own definition) takes the form of business-world jargon, like "office," above. "Office" was becoming a popular verb in the '90s, but happily, it seems to have died out.

1. "Firstly" should be "first."
   "Even" is superfluous and should be cut.
2. "Wasn't" should be "weren't."
   The sentence is correct as written.

​OK, "even" might be a bit much, but that's a matter of opinion. However, "first" is the kind of adverb known as a "flat adverb," meaning it's spelled the same in its adjective and adverb form. Not recognizing this, people often tack on an "-ly." The adverb "thus" often gets the same treatment.